What is your confused Q for 5/2?

If justice is about fairness, who determines whether the distribution of equality is indeed fair?

The text says that it is vital to refrain from bringing in any 'controversial ethical elements' and should instead be 'characterized by widely accepted stipulations'. Shouldn't it depend on the situation? Also, isn't it possible for widely accepted stipulations to be erroneous?

How is justice fairness?

how do unjust laws affect society justice if its unfair ?

men dont alway have the same valuse or beliefs.Dont that cause unjust situation?

how are social positions related to justice?

how can justice be fairness when justice isnt always fair?

I am confused so justice denies taken away someone's freedom? In all scenarios?

how can fairness in justice be seen in the eyes of immoral people and criminals?

does crawls truly believe that everyone would have the same mind set about justice and that it is fair or not ?

what would it take for justice to be fair when there is a social hierarchy?

Today,they're many laws and policies that are unjust.For example,people of color are being targeted and treated unfairly everyday. Why is that?

I don't understand what the contrast between the contract view and utilitarianism remains essential means

how is social positions tied into Rawls writing and would he be for or against utilitarianism?

If the principals of justice are chosen by parties who do not know their social or economic status, can we say that the principals are unjust? Is it re

I don't really understand how justice can be fair or unfair because of peoples different social positions

Is justice always fair?

men have different beliefs and principles which do cause unjust law, so how does it bring out to a well distributed justice system?

how do unjust laws affect society justice if its unfair ?

Can justice ever be fair in a social hierarchy ?

how is justice carried out fairly when there is different social positions?

how is justice carried out fairly when their is different social positions?

I did not understand the very last paragraph on page 16 of the reading

i dont understand how justice is fair bc of social positions

How is justice fairness? I don't understand the concept

is justice always carried out fairly?

although men disagree with different principals , what happens if what one person thinks is injustice; another does not?

can there be a society that is truly free of injustice?

if laws are unjust they should be revised

prejudice guides the principles of justice

can justice be fair when you think rationally and do not take interest in others point of view?