What is your confused Q for 5/4?

How are opportunities truly equal? What if one's motivation and abilities aren't good enough to succeed? What about competition??

So people on top can move up. what happens to those on the bottom? They dont. So how is that fair?

i dont understand how rawls thinks everyone has equal opportunity

how are the occupy wall street 'a diffuse group of people'?

how can other move up if the people(.1)at the top is call the shorts?

how would this be considered fair if this is the case?

how can people move up when only the ones on "top" have that opportunity?

how does the law get in the way of people making it or moving up?

can the liberty principle ever conflict with the equal opportunity principle?

are the people at the bottom put to intentionally keep at the bottom and not move up? Isn't that unfair?

it talks about people at the top moving up but is it only the people at the top? Why not the people at the bottom?

i had a bit of trouble understanding the academic exercise

how do you get fairness in occupation ?

What is egalitarianism that Seth Resler mentioned?

was resler saying that politics or philosophy wasn't a academic exercise?

Is this passage saying every needs to start from the same spot of opportunity?

at the top of society *

drastically up , what happens to the people at the very top and very bottom?

it says if a person at the top of moves up, its okay as long as it lifts the people at the bottom ... But what if someone from the bottom moves

I confused about equality of free opportunity because I do not think it exist ?

would it ever be possible to get fairness on an economical level?

I'm confused about what Rawles would say about the 4th question that is being asked in the reading (on the bottom of page 2).

On page 3 of the Occupation ad Fairness reading I didn't understand what was the academic exercise they were speaking of

Understood the reading but a question came up, would equality of fair opportunity apply to any other society except for ours?

understood the reading nd agreed opportunity should not be based on where u come from

It says that for equality to be demonstrated, the income of the bottom 20 percentage should be maximized right? Isn't that the same as working for maximum benefit for the least advantage?

can the liberty principle apply to civil disobedience

equality of fair opportunity means that everyone starts out equally

equality of fair opportunity means that everyone start out equally.