What is your confused Q for 3/16?

Aristotle's ideas behind teleological reasoning make sense, but who can righteously determine the purpose of something? Is justice ever just?

I'm not understanding Aristotle's view on how participating politics can be essential to living a good life?

How would Aristotle view our society with his theory of those who are equal will get equal things?

what does Aristotle mean that debate is part of the good life?

I read the passage a few times & still dont understand theological thinking.

I do not understand teleological thinking and aristotles idea of politics as the good life?

I agree that politics seems to be an important aspect in our society, Aristotle takes it a step saying that it in our nature. How is it that only in politics can human exercise the full capacity for language?

what does ''habits of the heart'' referring to?

i also dont understand how is politics the good life when it does not apply to everyone and there always has to be someone better or "best"

i dont understand teleological thinking

im confused that the aim of moral life is happiness and the good life is politics but its so hard to mesh in reality

what are the main reasons politician bring religions into jobs?

What is teleological thinking?

why does aristotle say that politics means having a good life? Or is having politics the only way one can have a good life?

why are people so considered about same sex marriage? Everyone should have a chance to be happy.

how is it that by living in polis and participating in politics the only way to" fully realize our nature as human beings"?

I dont see how the good life is related to politics. Politics creates problems and is not always just.

on page 196 I don't understand what "the moral life aims at happiness" means.

I don't understand the concept of teleological thinking and why it corresponds with justice or politics.

Is Aristotle trying to say that the purpose is more important than anything else when distributing good?

Why is it okay to discriminate according to merit for the people who are considered the best? What about the people who are trying to be the best?

i dont understand how politics is the good life

I agree with Aristotle's idea that a person should be given what one deserves.

On 197 he says that we become just by doing just acts, but some acts are not clear as just or unjust so what would happen in that situation?

On page 190 is aristotle saying that childrens books make us think more than we would if we read other books?

on page 188-189 is aristotle saying that teleological reasoning is about using the "best" players for a particular situation?

in the beginning is Aristotle saying that justice is only for the best of people?

Aristotle's method of thinking seems basic so do we really have higher functions than animals if our thought process is compared to Winnie the pooh

Doing good by participating in politics

if a person is bad and still participates in politics ; are they still "living the good life" because morally there intentions are wrong & there still

I'm not quite sure what Sandel is trying to say the purpose of politics are on page 192. It seemed a little a confusing the way he was explaining it

How is politics the good life when it is corrupt itself? Why can some people have it and not everyone? From what circumstances do we know weather someone is fit for a particular role or not? if laws are suppose to make us good people why are there many crimes?

people were forced from Africa to the Americas. Does that still mean those slave roles are natural?